34
edits
What is a “run-on” sentence?: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Run-on sentences, also known as "fused sentences", contain two independent clauses, either of which can stand by itself. When these two independent clauses are connected by a comma, it is known as a comma splice. When there is no comma, these clauses become harder to recognize. Another point about run-on sentences is that it really doesn't matter about the length of the sentence. A run-on can be a very short sentence, such as, ''Nothing is on television I should turn it off''. Just because a sentence is very long, though, it does not necessarily mean that it is a run-on. On one of the works I have cited below will have a link to a 239 word sentence. This quite long sentence is strucually correct, although it is not something you might want to use too much on papers or on-line entries. There are, of course, many ways to avoid a run-on sentence. A really easy way to join the two independent clauses together is by a semicolon. When using a semicolon, though, you must remember that the two ideas have to be closely related to one another. The other way to join the two independent clauses without having a run-on is to use either coordinating conjunctions or subordinating conjunctions. When using a coordinating conjunction, remeber this pattern [independent clause/ comma/ coordinating conjuntion/ indpendent clause]. Below is a list of ways to use coordinating conjunctures. | Run-on sentences, also known as "fused sentences", contain two independent clauses, either of which can stand by itself. When these two independent clauses are connected by a comma, it is known as a comma splice. When there is no comma, these clauses become harder to recognize. Another point about run-on sentences is that it really doesn't matter about the length of the sentence. A run-on can be a very short sentence, such as, ''Nothing is on television I should turn it off''. Just because a sentence is very long, though, it does not necessarily mean that it is a run-on. On one of the works I have cited below will have a link to a 239 word sentence. This quite long sentence is strucually correct, although it is not something you might want to use too much on papers or on-line entries. There are, of course, many ways to avoid a run-on sentence. A really easy way to join the two independent clauses together is by a semicolon. When using a semicolon, though, you must remember that the two ideas have to be closely related to one another. The other way to join the two independent clauses without having a run-on is to use either coordinating conjunctions or subordinating conjunctions. When using a coordinating conjunction, remeber this pattern [independent clause/ comma/ coordinating conjuntion/ indpendent clause]. Below is a list of ways to use coordinating conjunctures. | ||
Coordinating Conjunctures: | Coordinating Conjunctures: | ||
*Use ''and'' to indicate the addition of the second independent clause | *Use ''and'' to indicate the addition of the second independent clause. | ||
*Use | *Use ''but'' or ''yet'' to indicate contrast between two independent clauses. | ||
*Use ''or'' to indicate a choice or alternative between two independent clauses. | |||
*Use ''for'' to indicate that the second independent clause is the cause of the first. | |||
*Use ''so'' to indicate that the second independent clause is the result of the first. | |||
With subordinating conjunctures, there are two patterns you can use. The first [independent clause/subordinating conjuncture/independent clause] and the second is [subordinating conjuncture/independent clause/comma/independent clause]. Here are some ways to use subordinating conjunctures: | |||
*Use ''after, before, once, until, when,'' and ''where'' to indicate time relationships. | |||
*Use ''because'' and ''since'' to indicate a reason. | |||
*Use ''if'' to indicate cause and effect. | |||
*Use ''unless'' to indicate a negative cause and effect. | |||
*Use ''although'' and ''(even) though'' to indicate "in spite of" | |||