25
edits
Talk:Technical Writing in the Digital Age: Difference between revisions
Talk:Technical Writing in the Digital Age (view source)
Revision as of 14:15, 14 November 2023
, 1 year agono edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
:::::{{Reply to |APitts}} I looked over your work and it looks good to me! There were a couple of grammatical errors that I edited. -- [[User: HRoney]] | :::::{{Reply to |APitts}} I looked over your work and it looks good to me! There were a couple of grammatical errors that I edited. -- [[User: HRoney]] | ||
::::::{{Reply to |CBrown}} I agree that a single sentence is too brief for a topic/subtopic but I don't think that means all sections like that are "too unnecessary to even mention". I think that for single sentences we need to review that area to determine if we need to add further details. --[[User:TBara]] 13:53, | ::::::{{Reply to |CBrown}} I agree that a single sentence is too brief for a topic/subtopic but I don't think that means all sections like that are "too unnecessary to even mention". I think that for single sentences we need to review that area to determine if we need to add further details. --[[User:TBara]] 13:53, 14 November 2023 (EST) | ||
Added indents to keep the section readable, per wikipedia indentation philosophy. [[User:Cggreen|Cggreen]] ([[User talk:Cggreen|talk]]) 10:48, 14 November 2023 (EST) | Added indents to keep the section readable, per wikipedia indentation philosophy. [[User:Cggreen|Cggreen]] ([[User talk:Cggreen|talk]]) 10:48, 14 November 2023 (EST) | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
I agree with several of the other posts about overall organization and the flow of the article. I feel the article itself is good and has a lot of great content, I am just not sure about how it is currently laid out. For example, the intro is an "Overview of Technical Communication." In that section are types, aims and characteristics of technical communication. However, the next section is "Features of Technical Communication." All of these are related and should be included in one section if they all focus on various aspects of technical communication. There also seems to be a random order of the headings. The last heading on future trends is good, but right above that is pedagogical approaches. I think that should be earlier in the article. Also, there is a heading for examples of digital documents under a heading on digital documents which includes lots of subheadings. Again, I think content is great. I just think we could clean it up a bit. | I agree with several of the other posts about overall organization and the flow of the article. I feel the article itself is good and has a lot of great content, I am just not sure about how it is currently laid out. For example, the intro is an "Overview of Technical Communication." In that section are types, aims and characteristics of technical communication. However, the next section is "Features of Technical Communication." All of these are related and should be included in one section if they all focus on various aspects of technical communication. There also seems to be a random order of the headings. The last heading on future trends is good, but right above that is pedagogical approaches. I think that should be earlier in the article. Also, there is a heading for examples of digital documents under a heading on digital documents which includes lots of subheadings. Again, I think content is great. I just think we could clean it up a bit. | ||
==Expansion Needed== | |||
While reviewing the article, there are specific sections without enough detail that need to be expanded. These three sections are Overview-Types of Technical Communication, Ethical Considerations-The Public, and Future Trends and Challenges-Future Trends. Also is it okay to have a single subsection under Appropriateness? Do we need or have planned to have additional subsections or should we eliminate the subheading "Audience-specific"?--[[User:TBara]] 14:14, 14 November 2023 (EST) | |||