Talk:Technical Writing in the Digital Age: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 43: Line 43:
:::::{{Reply to |APitts}} I looked over your work and it looks good to me! There were a couple of grammatical errors that I edited. -- [[User: HRoney]]
:::::{{Reply to |APitts}} I looked over your work and it looks good to me! There were a couple of grammatical errors that I edited. -- [[User: HRoney]]


::::::{{Reply to |CBrown}} I agree that a single sentence is too brief for a topic/subtopic but I don't think that means all sections like that are "too unnecessary to even mention".  I think that for single sentences we need to review that area to determine if we need to add further details. --[[User:TBara]] 13:53, 14 November 2023 (EST)
::::::{{Reply to |CBrown}} I agree that a single sentence is too brief for a topic/subtopic but I don't think that means all sections like that are "too unnecessary to even mention".  I think that for single sentences we need to review that area to determine if we need to add further details. --[[User:TBara]]([[User talk:TBara|talk]]) 13:53, 14 November 2023 (EST)


Added indents to keep the section readable, per wikipedia indentation philosophy. [[User:Cggreen|Cggreen]] ([[User talk:Cggreen|talk]]) 10:48, 14 November 2023 (EST)
Added indents to keep the section readable, per wikipedia indentation philosophy. [[User:Cggreen|Cggreen]] ([[User talk:Cggreen|talk]]) 10:48, 14 November 2023 (EST)
25

edits