twitter
15
edits
EnigmaTowles (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
An example of the term, verisimilitude, would be if an author writes about a man who falls off a cliff and he dies, it is believable. It is logical that a person can believe an event or character in a fiction story is real so, a story can have a degree of verisimilitude in fiction stories as well as non-fiction stories, as long as the reader feels that it is real (Wheeler)<ref name=Ref1/>. | An example of the term, verisimilitude, would be if an author writes about a man who falls off a cliff and he dies, it is believable. It is logical that a person can believe an event or character in a fiction story is real so, a story can have a degree of verisimilitude in fiction stories as well as non-fiction stories, as long as the reader feels that it is real (Wheeler)<ref name=Ref1/>. | ||
Fantasy novels and science fiction stories that discuss impossible events can have verisimilitude if the reader is able to read them with suspended disbelief (Eagleton)<ref name=Ref3/>. To say that a work has a high degree of verisimilitude means that the work is very realistic and believable--it is "true to life" (Harris)<ref name=Ref2/>. | Fantasy novels and science fiction stories that discuss impossible events can have verisimilitude if the reader is able to read them with suspended disbelief (Eagleton)<ref name=Ref3/>. To say that a work has a high degree of verisimilitude means that the work is very realistic and believable--it is "true to life" (Harris)<ref name=Ref2/>. | ||
==The Problem With Verisimilitude== | |||
While verisimilitude is considered of a method of making an event or set of circumstances believable, with some magnification, there is a problem with the theory behind verisimilitude. The reader or viewer is given a set of circumstances that are plausible in that particular universe. The argument is that one false theory may be closer to reality than another. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper Karl Popper], famous for theories on verisimilitude, asks two important questions; | |||
"Can we explain how one theory can be closer to the truth, or has greater verisimilitude than another?" | |||
"Can we show that scientific change has sometimes led to theories which are closer to the truth than their predecessors?"<ref>http://philosophy.wisc.edu/forster/220/notes_10.html</ref> | |||
This question brings light to the reality of evolving scientific knowledge and truth. What may not be true today, may become a reality in the future. | |||
== Works Cited == | == Works Cited == | ||
Line 14: | Line 23: | ||
*Mifflin, Houghton. "Verisimilitude." ''Webster’s II New College Dictionary.'' 2001,1999,1995 | *Mifflin, Houghton. "Verisimilitude." ''Webster’s II New College Dictionary.'' 2001,1999,1995 | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Line 32: | Line 40: | ||
[http://www.masconomet.org/teachers/trevenen/litterms.htm] | [http://www.masconomet.org/teachers/trevenen/litterms.htm] | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||