15
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
The examples are helpful. need to revise. | The examples are helpful. need to revise. | ||
-daniel Epps | -daniel Epps | ||
Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief. | |||
-Robert Bartosh | |||
This was a good entry. I thought it was informative and not overly wordy. Try to be a little more clear about word choice's connection to tone.-Amberly Keough | |||
Papers was well written and easy to read. The bolded words catches the readers attention and it's easy to understand. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 20:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) |
edits