15
edits
Talk:What is “tone”?: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Very good Lit wiki. You had a lot of information on what tone was. The examples were also very helpful. You may need to do a little revising. | Very good Lit wiki. You had a lot of information on what tone was. The examples were also very helpful. You may need to do a little revising. | ||
-Whitney Behel | -Whitney Behel | ||
Very good article. Could not find any errors in it. Full of information and easy to understand. | |||
-Terence Heenan | |||
This is a good entry. It is clearly written. Anthony Jones | |||
The examples are helpful. need to revise. | |||
-daniel Epps | |||
Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief. | |||
-Robert Bartosh | |||
This was a good entry. I thought it was informative and not overly wordy. Try to be a little more clear about word choice's connection to tone.-Amberly Keough | |||
Papers was well written and easy to read. The bolded words catches the readers attention and it's easy to understand. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 20:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | |||