1,254
edits
Talk:What is “redundancy”?: Difference between revisions
Where is your work?
No edit summary |
(Where is your work?) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I like the format that the author used to illustrate their point. I like the way the examples were given . The paper seemed to have pretty good scanability and it was decently sufficient in the information it gave on the topic. Over all there were not any grammatical errors noticed, but more elaborative sentences could have been used. | I like the format that the author used to illustrate their point. I like the way the examples were given . The paper seemed to have pretty good scanability and it was decently sufficient in the information it gave on the topic. Over all there were not any grammatical errors noticed, but more elaborative sentences could have been used. | ||
--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:14, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | --[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:14, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | ||
like the format. easy to read. good job. | |||
This entry was formatted very well. The examples were done very creativly. | |||
This entry has some grammatical errors and missing a few commas. It was easy to understand and the bulleted lists were excellent. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 20:04, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | |||
-Robert Bartosh | |||
== Where is your work? == | |||
It seems the majority of your entry is a quotation. This is not research, nor does it make a very readable entry. Use your own words. Also, proofread for clarity and consistency. --[[User:Glucas|Glucas]] 11:06, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT) | |||