Talk:What is “redundancy”?: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:What is “redundancy”? (view source)

Revision as of 11:06, 25 April 2005

1,481 bytes added , 19 years ago

Where is your work?

Glucas

Bureaucrats, Administrators

1,254

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I like the way yours was broken into certain sections. You were clear and it caught my attention. You could maybe do a few more examples.-Amberly Keough
+The entry was well cited and has a lot of great information. You could add links to other pages. Add a table of contents to the entry so that a person could go directly to a part about redundancy they want to read about. You have good examples and with some quick fixes it will be a good entry. - Dave Burkert
+THis entry is very to the point.  It has alot of good imformation.  D Davis
+This article had a lot of good information and examples. Didn't like how the page was seperated though.
+-Terence Heenan
+I like the format that the author used to illustrate their point. I like the way the examples were given .  The paper seemed to have pretty good scanability and it was decently sufficient in the information it gave on the topic.  Over all there were not any grammatical errors noticed, but more elaborative sentences could have been used.
+--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:14, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
+like the format. easy to read. good job.
+This entry was formatted very well.  The examples were done very creativly.
+This entry has some grammatical errors and missing a few commas. It was easy to understand and the bulleted lists were excellent. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 20:04, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
+-Robert Bartosh
+== Where is your work? ==
+It seems the majority of your entry is a quotation. This is not research, nor does it make a very readable entry. Use your own words. Also, proofread for clarity and consistency. --[[User:Glucas|Glucas]] 11:06, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)