15
edits
Talk:What are “transitions”?: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Page could use a bit more information. There are some errors, especially when the author was listing points. | Page could use a bit more information. There are some errors, especially when the author was listing points. | ||
-Terence Heenan | -Terence Heenan | ||
Paper was well written and it had good points. Topic chosen was illustrated in an effective way for the internet. It was easy to scan for important information, and good examples were being used. Over all paper was well written and no grammatical errors were noticed. Paper was clear and it looks to need no further review by the author. Paper seemed to utilize the editing bar to its fullest. Good entry. | |||
--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:36, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | |||
This paper was easy to scan and understand without getting bored. The scrolling was very limited because you used bullets wich is a complement. Grammer, machanics,and styles are good.--[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 13:41, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | |||