Talk:Technical Writing in the Digital Age: Difference between revisions

Line 48: Line 48:


::::::{{Reply to |CBrown}} I agree that a single sentence is too brief for a topic/subtopic but I don't think that means all sections like that are "too unnecessary to even mention".  I think that for single sentences we need to review that area to determine if we need to add further details. --[[User:TBara]]([[User talk:TBara|talk]]) 13:53, 14 November 2023 (EST)
::::::{{Reply to |CBrown}} I agree that a single sentence is too brief for a topic/subtopic but I don't think that means all sections like that are "too unnecessary to even mention".  I think that for single sentences we need to review that area to determine if we need to add further details. --[[User:TBara]]([[User talk:TBara|talk]]) 13:53, 14 November 2023 (EST)
:::::::{{Reply to |TBara}} I am fairly certain that is the way the word "seem" works. -- [[User:CBrown]]


Added indents to keep the section readable, per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Indentation wikipedia indentation] philosophy. [[User:Cggreen|Cggreen]] ([[User talk:Cggreen|talk]]) 10:48, 14 November 2023 (EST)
Added indents to keep the section readable, per [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Indentation wikipedia indentation] philosophy. [[User:Cggreen|Cggreen]] ([[User talk:Cggreen|talk]]) 10:48, 14 November 2023 (EST)
100

edits