Talk:Literary criticism: Difference between revisions

From LitWiki
(Created page with "Looking really good, guys. A couple of suggestions: * remove the Introduction header. This sections should be above the TOC, like all Wikipedia entries. * use Subheads feathe...")
(No difference)

Revision as of 06:38, 12 July 2014

Looking really good, guys. A couple of suggestions:

  • remove the Introduction header. This sections should be above the TOC, like all Wikipedia entries.
  • use Subheads feather than bullets and bold. These will then appear in the TOC.
  • remove spaces before footnote numbers. These should be right on the information they are citing. Again see Wikipedia for examples.
  • no external links in a Links section?
  • titles of essays should be in quotation marks — not italicized.
  • make sure paragraphs are full returns. They are not in the "Types" section. There's lots of info there and it's all bunched together.
  • check capitalization: headers should conform to title cap conventions.
  • some reference are repeated rather than using the REF tag correctly. No references should be repeated. If it's the same, it should share an entry.
  • should dictionaries be cited?

Make these changes, folks, and you probably have an A for this assignment.

--Admin (talk) 06:38, 12 July 2014 (EDT)