1,254
edits
Talk:How do I know when I need to use a comma?: Difference between revisions
Talk:How do I know when I need to use a comma? (view source)
Revision as of 11:08, 25 April 2005
, 19 years agoCitations?
No edit summary |
(Citations?) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
This paper was very well written. It was clearly understandable, yet it could have used maybe some bold print in some areas to draw the readers attention. | This paper was very well written. It was clearly understandable, yet it could have used maybe some bold print in some areas to draw the readers attention. | ||
-Robert Bartosh | -Robert Bartosh | ||
Instead of listing 1, 2,3 just make a table of contents with a small bolded heading. If you bullet the information under those headings it will become eye friendly and catch peoples attention. Great information, but it needs to look like a web page. You could add additional links to outer web sites with similar information. - Dave Burkert | |||
This paper was well written and very easy to read. It had limited scrolling so people do not mind reading all of the text without getting bored quickly. Your grammer was great but be sure to check spelling. | |||
--[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 13:33, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | |||
Paper was informative, but needs to work on scanability, or viewing ease. It was not very easy to notice the very important things right off, but if looked at closely than the information can be viewed. Maybe a different format should be used. It was o.k. | |||
--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 12:12, 29 Mar 2005 (EST) | |||
== Citations? == | |||
You do not cite any works, but you have a works cited section. Are you sure this is the clearest way you could have set up your entry? --[[User:Glucas|Glucas]] 11:08, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT) | |||