Talk:How do I know when I need to use a comma?: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Talk:How do I know when I need to use a comma? (view source)

Revision as of 11:08, 25 April 2005

1,784 bytes added , 19 years ago

Citations?

Glucas

Bureaucrats, Administrators

1,254

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-There were a few spelling errors,specifically hamster and together. Another thing is the paragraph before the eight rules. Just narrow it down a little. I thought this was a good entry. It was clearly expressed.
+There were a few spelling errors,specifically hamster and together. Another thing is the paragraph before the eight rules could be narrowed slightly. I thought this was a good entry.
+-Amberly Keough
+I liked how you use the example to explain how to use the commas correctly. Check over your first paragraph you may want to re-word some of the sentences. Very helpful Lit wiki.
+-Whitney Behel
+This article was well written and informative. There seemed to be very few spelling and grammar errors. This entry could have used some more works to cite.
+-Terence Heenan
+This was a good entry. It was full of information.  I think you could condense this entry to make it more scannable.  Anthony Jones
+This paper was very well written.  It was clearly understandable, yet it could have used maybe some bold print in some areas to draw the readers attention.
+-Robert Bartosh
+Instead of listing 1, 2,3 just make a table of contents with a small bolded heading. If you bullet the information under those headings it will become eye friendly and catch peoples attention. Great information, but it needs to look like a web page. You could add additional links to outer web sites with similar information. - Dave Burkert
+This paper was well written and very easy to read. It had limited scrolling so people do not mind reading all of the text without getting bored quickly. Your grammer was great but be sure to check spelling.
+ --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 13:33, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
+Paper was informative, but needs to work on scanability, or viewing ease.  It was not very easy to notice the very important things right off, but if looked at closely than the information can be viewed.  Maybe a different format should be used. It was o.k.
+--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 12:12, 29 Mar 2005 (EST)
+== Citations? ==
+You do not cite any works, but you have a works cited section. Are you sure this is the clearest way you could have set up your entry? --[[User:Glucas|Glucas]] 11:08, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)