Talk:Faust: Difference between revisions

From LitWiki
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Dr. Lucas' Critiques==
Eric, did you not see the [[Faust Summary]]? There are several parenthetical citations, but I do not see any works cited entries. Why not? Everyone should proofread. --[[User:Glucas|Glucas]] 08:35, 20 Feb 2006 (EST)
Eric, did you not see the [[Faust Summary]]? There are several parenthetical citations, but I do not see any works cited entries. Why not? Everyone should proofread. --[[User:Glucas|Glucas]] 08:35, 20 Feb 2006 (EST)
==Concerning the Critical Perspective Heading==
This critical perspecitve seems little choppy, lets see if we can get better flow to it, im asking that the original author come forward and fix this, if any problem exists[[User:Rsellars|Rsellars]] 12:21, 22 Feb 2006 (EST)
==Study Guide==
it seems more logical to have the study guide compiled by the students as a subpage, seeing as how a great deal of that is more opinionated than it is factual.... just a suggestion  [[User:Rsellars|Rsellars]] 11:14, 27 Feb 2006 (EST)

Latest revision as of 12:14, 27 February 2006

Dr. Lucas' Critiques

Eric, did you not see the Faust Summary? There are several parenthetical citations, but I do not see any works cited entries. Why not? Everyone should proofread. --Glucas 08:35, 20 Feb 2006 (EST)

Concerning the Critical Perspective Heading

This critical perspecitve seems little choppy, lets see if we can get better flow to it, im asking that the original author come forward and fix this, if any problem existsRsellars 12:21, 22 Feb 2006 (EST)

Study Guide

it seems more logical to have the study guide compiled by the students as a subpage, seeing as how a great deal of that is more opinionated than it is factual.... just a suggestion Rsellars 11:14, 27 Feb 2006 (EST)