Talk:What is “redundancy”?

From LitWiki
Revision as of 13:14, 24 March 2005 by Apitt329 (talk | contribs)

I like the way yours was broken into certain sections. You were clear and it caught my attention. You could maybe do a few more examples.-Amberly Keough

The entry was well cited and has a lot of great information. You could add links to other pages. Add a table of contents to the entry so that a person could go directly to a part about redundancy they want to read about. You have good examples and with some quick fixes it will be a good entry. - Dave Burkert

THis entry is very to the point. It has alot of good imformation. D Davis

This article had a lot of good information and examples. Didn't like how the page was seperated though. -Terence Heenan


I like the format that the author used to illustrate their point. I like the way the examples were given . The paper seemed to have pretty good scanability and it was decently sufficient in the information it gave on the topic. Over all there were not any grammatical errors noticed, but more elaborative sentences could have been used. --Apitt329 13:14, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)