Talk:Technical Writing in the Digital Age: Difference between revisions

Line 151: Line 151:
:{{Reply to|Beth Kennedy}}  I think it makes perfect sense! I just threw categories in to get it started and have already changed them around as I research. I am thinking of adding a separate "tools" section to mimic what is on the Wikipedia entry. Thoughts?
:{{Reply to|Beth Kennedy}}  I think it makes perfect sense! I just threw categories in to get it started and have already changed them around as I research. I am thinking of adding a separate "tools" section to mimic what is on the Wikipedia entry. Thoughts?
::{{Reply to|Debbiebwolfe}}I think adding "tools" is a good idea, but I wonder if it would be good to have them under the current "Digital Technologies and Technical Writing" section? The list would help to expand this section and would reinforce the digital connection. Just a thought.--[[User:Beth Kennedy|Beth Kennedy]] ([[User talk:Beth Kennedy|talk]]) 10:04, 21 November 2023 (EST)
::{{Reply to|Debbiebwolfe}}I think adding "tools" is a good idea, but I wonder if it would be good to have them under the current "Digital Technologies and Technical Writing" section? The list would help to expand this section and would reinforce the digital connection. Just a thought.--[[User:Beth Kennedy|Beth Kennedy]] ([[User talk:Beth Kennedy|talk]]) 10:04, 21 November 2023 (EST)
== Digital Technologies and Technical Writing ==
I reformatted this section to flesh it out. I renamed it "Digital Technologies Tools" to capture tools commonly used by technical writers as seen on Wikipedia's [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_writing Technical Writing] entry. I added a few categories to get it started. Feel free to edit and add more categories as needed.--[[User:Debbiebwolfe|Debbiebwolfe]] ([[User talk:Debbiebwolfe|talk]]) 08:05, 24 November 2023 (EST)
90

edits