339
edits
User talk:Jordanandrews2: Difference between revisions
→Posted in the Wrong Place: new section
(Created page with "I enjoyed reading through the material this week and familiarizing myself with the disciplinary approach to technical writing and how it can integrate into digital writing. As I write, I find it fundamentally important to grow and change how we communicate to ensure we can learn and help each other. The way I see it, if we never learn new ways of communicating, we will never learn anything except what we already know. The uniqueness and interactive nature of digital writ...") |
(→Posted in the Wrong Place: new section) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I found the definitions and details of the User-centered design, Interactive elements, and hyperlinks/references interesting as well. I am working on becoming a great writer and as stated before, I have struggles with narrowing down exactly who I am speaking to in my writing. The user-centered design and its emphasis on easily navigable information I found helpful, and I am unsure of how to present my information in this way. I believe this class will ease my worry on the front. The same point can be made about interactive elements. Most of my work is quite wordy, and I need to figure out what elements I am most comfortable with and how to integrate them into my work. I believe by doing so I will be able to reach more readers and more creatively. Hyperlinks and references would assist with the credibility factor in my information, and I never realized this. I have reviewed many articles, newspapers, books, and journals and whenever I see a hyperlink or extensive reference list, I do feel that the author may have done their homework and this work may be something I should be more interested and believe in. I need to utilize this tactic to help my readers trust and find my work credible. | I found the definitions and details of the User-centered design, Interactive elements, and hyperlinks/references interesting as well. I am working on becoming a great writer and as stated before, I have struggles with narrowing down exactly who I am speaking to in my writing. The user-centered design and its emphasis on easily navigable information I found helpful, and I am unsure of how to present my information in this way. I believe this class will ease my worry on the front. The same point can be made about interactive elements. Most of my work is quite wordy, and I need to figure out what elements I am most comfortable with and how to integrate them into my work. I believe by doing so I will be able to reach more readers and more creatively. Hyperlinks and references would assist with the credibility factor in my information, and I never realized this. I have reviewed many articles, newspapers, books, and journals and whenever I see a hyperlink or extensive reference list, I do feel that the author may have done their homework and this work may be something I should be more interested and believe in. I need to utilize this tactic to help my readers trust and find my work credible. | ||
While it is important to know who I am speaking to, it must be accessible to all. I find it difficult to know for sure exactly who I am speaking to, and therefore, foresee who will have access to my work. That, in my opinion, is the conundrum with digital writing. The internet and everywhere, and digital platforms have essentially taken over our world. Where does the old way of writing tie into that issue of the internet. The great thing about digital writing is its diverse nature and its capability to be fully accessible. If I write a journal, or article, will everyone have access to it? Or will there be a pay wall or some other impediment? I read through the multiple examples of how to integrate these two fields and although they make sense to me, I still have reservations. I look forward to easing my fear of the digital world as well as my fears associated with artificial intelligence and its inevitable takeover. 😊 | While it is important to know who I am speaking to, it must be accessible to all. I find it difficult to know for sure exactly who I am speaking to, and therefore, foresee who will have access to my work. That, in my opinion, is the conundrum with digital writing. The internet and everywhere, and digital platforms have essentially taken over our world. Where does the old way of writing tie into that issue of the internet. The great thing about digital writing is its diverse nature and its capability to be fully accessible. If I write a journal, or article, will everyone have access to it? Or will there be a pay wall or some other impediment? I read through the multiple examples of how to integrate these two fields and although they make sense to me, I still have reservations. I look forward to easing my fear of the digital world as well as my fears associated with artificial intelligence and its inevitable takeover. 😊 | ||
== Posted in the Wrong Place == | |||
Is this your blog/journal post for the week? If so, it should go on the [https://blog.techwriting.digital blog]. Thanks. —[[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 08:41, 11 October 2023 (EDT) | |||