twitter
50
edits
Synecdoche: Difference between revisions
→Differences
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Synecdoche and Metonymy are similar, but different. BUILD OFF OF THIS | Synecdoche and Metonymy are similar, but different. BUILD OFF OF THIS | ||
=== Differences === | === Differences === | ||
According to Bredin, “synecdochic relations are structural, and metonymical relations are extrinsic – relations, in the one case, between particulars and their parts, and in the other case between particulars and other particulars” (54). While synecdoche focuses on intra-relativity (the relation of the whole and its parts), metonymy focses on extra-relativity (the “intuitions of necessary relation”). In “A Grouping of Figures of Speech, Based upon the Principle of Their Effectiveness” by Herbert Eveleth Greene, “metonymy names things at a slight remove: instead of naming the thing itself, it names something associated with it, and trusts to the imagination to supply what is not stated, – both the thing unnamed and the relation which bridges the gulf between the two” (438). For example, “War is sad.” On the other hand, synecdoche deals with words or relations between words such as alternate names for the same thing. For example, nickle can be interchanged with five coin piece (Bredin 52). | |||
=== Differences === | |||
=== Similarities === | === Similarities === | ||