Verisimilitude: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 6: Line 6:


==The Problem With Verisimilitude==
==The Problem With Verisimilitude==
While verisimilitude is considered of a method of making an event or set of circumstances believable, with some magnification, there is a problem with the theory behind verisimilitude. The reader or viewer is given a set of circumstances are plausible in that ficitonal universe. The argument is that one false theory may be closer to reality than another. This begs two important questions;
While verisimilitude is considered of a method of making an event or set of circumstances believable, with some magnification, there is a problem with the theory behind verisimilitude. The reader or viewer is given a set of circumstances that are plausible in that particular universe. The argument is that one false theory may be closer to reality than another. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper Karl Popper], famous for theories on verisimilitude, asks two important questions;


"Can we explain how one theory can be closer to the truth, or has greater verisimilitude than another?"
"Can we explain how one theory can be closer to the truth, or has greater verisimilitude than another?"


"Can we show that scientific change has sometimes led to theories which are closer to the truth than their predecessors?"
"Can we show that scientific change has sometimes led to theories which are closer to the truth than their predecessors?"<ref>http://philosophy.wisc.edu/forster/220/notes_10.html</ref>
 
This question brings light to the reality of evolving scientific knowledge and truth. What may not be true today, may become a reality in the future.
   
   
== Works Cited ==
== Works Cited ==
twitter
15

edits