twitter
22
edits
Talk:What is a “run-on” sentence?: Difference between revisions
Talk:What is a “run-on” sentence? (view source)
Revision as of 14:22, 9 November 2013
, 11 years agono edit summary
No edit summary |
Jessyjaded (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A lot of great information. You need to break up the long paragraphs and add a table of contents. The information just needs to broke up in to sections. Bold and add bullets to information. You could add links to the page and put a works cited area for where you got the information. - Dave Burkert | A lot of great information. You need to break up the long paragraphs and add a table of contents. The information just needs to broke up in to sections. Bold and add bullets to information. You could add links to the page and put a works cited area for where you got the information. -Dave Burkert | ||
The long paragraphs take away from the information. I do not know for | The long paragraphs take away from the information. I do not know for sure, but I don't think we were supposed to use "I".-Amberly Keough | ||
This entry has a huge opening paragraph. I don't think people would want to read it to get the imformation. D Davis | This entry has a huge opening paragraph. I don't think people would want to read it to get the imformation. -D Davis | ||
You need to seperate your first paragraph. You have a lot of good information, but it does not stand out because its all stuck together. I liked how you linked your sources. | You need to seperate your first paragraph. You have a lot of good information, but it does not stand out because its all stuck together. I liked how you linked your sources. | ||
-Whitney Behel | -Whitney Behel | ||
Condense information so that the reader can scan for the information that they will benifit from. -Anthony Jones | |||
Condense information so that the reader can scan for the information that they will benifit from. Anthony Jones | |||
Paper should have been broken down further to have the important information easy to grasp immediately. There were some grammatical errors, but paper over all had a good tone that was understandable. It is good that there were more than three resources being used. Entry was good it just needs to be revised for the internet a little more. | Paper should have been broken down further to have the important information easy to grasp immediately. There were some grammatical errors, but paper over all had a good tone that was understandable. It is good that there were more than three resources being used. Entry was good it just needs to be revised for the internet a little more. | ||