twitter
58
edits
What are good sources to cite?: Difference between revisions
→Peer-Reviewed
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
The hallmarks of a bad site are unreliable authors with unverifiable credentials. Their content is often driven by the average internet user and cannot be trusted. Some examples of such pages are ''Blogs, Personal Websites,'' and ''Wikipedia''. | The hallmarks of a bad site are unreliable authors with unverifiable credentials. Their content is often driven by the average internet user and cannot be trusted. Some examples of such pages are ''Blogs, Personal Websites,'' and ''Wikipedia''. | ||
== Peer-Reviewed == | == Peer-Reviewed == | ||
== Scholarly Articles == | == Scholarly Articles == | ||