Talk:WritDM Spring 2013 Proposal: Difference between revisions

more feedback
(Created page with "A very good start. I'm not sure about your focus — in that it doesn't seem focused enough. In other words: it might be too much. When I suggested that you take on the Compo...")
 
(more feedback)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
If I'm being honest, I really do not like your topic. I think it's not original enough, and there are already plenty of resources on the Interwebs about Wordpress. It also might be way too much work and research. And fairly tedious. Seriously, do people really need to be told about the dashboard? Posts? Themes? Is this not covered ''ad nauseum'' on the Web already? I also do not see how your purpose relates to the revised topic?
I'm sorry, guys, but I think your topic could be much better and much more useful, especially since I gave you two excellent ones to consider.
(Where are the group posts? Why is Carroll's title italicized and put in quotation marks? Which should it be?)
Perhaps if you phrased it like: “How to Build a Blog: the College Student Edition” it might be much better. This way, it could be more general, discuss points relevant to WritDM, and still cover Wordpress.
At this point, you may do what you like, but I really would advise you to reconsider your topic one more time. Do we need to revise due dates? If so, please communicate with me.
[[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 09:54, 22 March 2013 (EDT)
----
A very good start.
A very good start.