Talk:What is the “passive voice”?: Difference between revisions

From LitWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 19: Line 19:


This entry is very informative, but the word count needs to be cut in half to keep the readers attention. You had a few machanical errors also. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 13:38, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
This entry is very informative, but the word count needs to be cut in half to keep the readers attention. You had a few machanical errors also. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 13:38, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
The paper was well written and it had good points, but the paper should have been broken down further to have the important information easy to grasp immediately.  There were some grammatical errors, For example, “ is it is” was used. Entry was good it just needs to be revised for the internet a little more.
--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:41, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)

Latest revision as of 13:41, 24 March 2005

You may want to explain what passive voice is a little clearer. I like how you stated when passive voice should be used. That topic was very helpful. You might want to open up the first paragraph in a way simialar to how you exlpained possessive tense. - Whitney Behel

Do something to grab the readers attention. Nothing on this paper grabed my attention while scrolling it. -Robert Bartosh

The entry is kind of wordy. It needs to get to the point quicker. But over all the rest of the entry is clear and easy to use. D Davis

This entry is full of information. However it does not keep my attention. Anthony Jones

This article needs a bit more structure to it. It just seemed too sparadic. Just bring it a bit more together. -Terence Heenan

+ This entry is full of information. However it does not keep my attention. Anthony Jones

This entry is very well organized. Add a table of contents. If you bold the word examples it will grab the eye. Could add outer links to the entry.-Dave Burkert

This entry is very informative, but the word count needs to be cut in half to keep the readers attention. You had a few machanical errors also. --Dflowers 13:38, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)


The paper was well written and it had good points, but the paper should have been broken down further to have the important information easy to grasp immediately. There were some grammatical errors, For example, “ is it is” was used. Entry was good it just needs to be revised for the internet a little more. --Apitt329 13:41, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)