Talk:What is “redundancy”?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
THis entry is very to the point. It has alot of good imformation. D Davis | THis entry is very to the point. It has alot of good imformation. D Davis | ||
This article had a lot of good information and examples. Didn't like how the page was seperated though. | |||
-Terence Heenan |
Revision as of 13:11, 24 March 2005
I like the way yours was broken into certain sections. You were clear and it caught my attention. You could maybe do a few more examples.-Amberly Keough
The entry was well cited and has a lot of great information. You could add links to other pages. Add a table of contents to the entry so that a person could go directly to a part about redundancy they want to read about. You have good examples and with some quick fixes it will be a good entry. - Dave Burkert
THis entry is very to the point. It has alot of good imformation. D Davis
This article had a lot of good information and examples. Didn't like how the page was seperated though. -Terence Heenan