28
edits
Technical Writing in the Digital Age: Difference between revisions
Technical Writing in the Digital Age (view source)
Revision as of 11:50, 11 November 2023
, 6 months ago→Ethical Considerations: used website template
No edit summary |
(→Ethical Considerations: used website template) |
||
| Line 183: | Line 183: | ||
Technical communicators may occasionally work for an organization with strict privacy policies that prohibit they from using the documents they create outside of the organization. It is important for ethical communicators to follow the privacy policy for their organization because unauthorized release of information could lead to consequences up to an including termination.<ref name=":4" /> | Technical communicators may occasionally work for an organization with strict privacy policies that prohibit they from using the documents they create outside of the organization. It is important for ethical communicators to follow the privacy policy for their organization because unauthorized release of information could lead to consequences up to an including termination.<ref name=":4" /> | ||
Technical communicators have an obligation to the environment. This obligation includes alerting their supervisors, managers, and executive leadership to products or processes that are detrimental to the environment. Disposal of hazardous waste is far more costly than dumping it. Organizations could be tempted to skirt the legal procedures.<ref name=":0" /> One would hope that the penalty of 5 years and/or up to $50,000 per day for knowingly disposing of hazardous waste in a way contrary to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's regulations would be a sufficient deterrent.{{cite web | Technical communicators have an obligation to the environment. This obligation includes alerting their supervisors, managers, and executive leadership to products or processes that are detrimental to the environment. Disposal of hazardous waste is far more costly than dumping it. Organizations could be tempted to skirt the legal procedures.<ref name=":0" /> One would hope that the penalty of 5 years and/or up to $50,000 per day for knowingly disposing of hazardous waste in a way contrary to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's regulations would be a sufficient deterrent. | ||
| url = https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/criminal-provisions-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra | {{cite web | ||
| title = Criminal Provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act | |url=https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/criminal-provisions-resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra | ||
| website = United States Environmental Protection Agency | |title=Criminal Provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act | ||
| access-date = November 06, 2023 | |website=United States Environmental Protection Agency | ||
|access-date=November 06, 2023, | |||
}} | }} | ||