Talk:What is “tone”?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief. | Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief. | ||
-Robert Bartosh | -Robert Bartosh | ||
This was a good entry. I thought it was informative and not overly wordy. Try to be a little more clear about word choice's connection to tone.-Amberly Keough |
Revision as of 13:25, 24 March 2005
Try to make the sections a little more brief and to the point. Paragraphs of information do not catch the eye and make you want to read it, but try to bullet or bold information. These make the eye stop and read what is going on. You have great information within the wiki, but you just need to make it more appealing to eye. Think of it as you were scrolling the page quickly. What would catch your eye? Overall just need little revision.
Dave Burkert
This entry is full understandable ways of using tone in writting. The entry is also put together clearly. D Davis
Very good Lit wiki. You had a lot of information on what tone was. The examples were also very helpful. You may need to do a little revising. -Whitney Behel
Very good article. Could not find any errors in it. Full of information and easy to understand. -Terence Heenan
This is a good entry. It is clearly written. Anthony Jones
The examples are helpful. need to revise. -daniel Epps
Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief. -Robert Bartosh
This was a good entry. I thought it was informative and not overly wordy. Try to be a little more clear about word choice's connection to tone.-Amberly Keough