Talk:What is the difference between possessives and plurals?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
This paper had decent scanability. It was somewhat difficult to read due to the appearance of some run-on's. Some ideas should have been simplified in language to clearly illustrate authors point. Some more information should have been added to further the topic a bit more. There were not many outside links, but paper was overall O.K. | This paper had decent scanability. It was somewhat difficult to read due to the appearance of some run-on's. Some ideas should have been simplified in language to clearly illustrate authors point. Some more information should have been added to further the topic a bit more. There were not many outside links, but paper was overall O.K. | ||
--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | --[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) | ||
This enrty has some good examples. But it needs to be more to the point | |||
D Davis |
Revision as of 13:13, 24 March 2005
This was a well written article. I feel that all of the headings and following material for each one was a great style for it. Good job on citing the works, too. -Terence Heenan
Very well written. The wiki site flows logically and has information bulleted and bold so it grabs the attention of the reader. Has works cited at bottom and done correctly. You could add similar web sites as links at the bottom. - Dave Burkert
This was a good entry. I think your first paragraph was a little wordy. Anthony Jones
This paper had decent scanability. It was somewhat difficult to read due to the appearance of some run-on's. Some ideas should have been simplified in language to clearly illustrate authors point. Some more information should have been added to further the topic a bit more. There were not many outside links, but paper was overall O.K. --Apitt329 13:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
This enrty has some good examples. But it needs to be more to the point D Davis