Talk:Technical Writing in the Digital Age: Difference between revisions
Debbiebwolfe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Debbiebwolfe (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:{{Reply to|Debbiebwolfe}} I would put references at the bottom, in a bibliography section. Then you can use the shortened footnotes in the body. This is an easier approach for everyone editing, as they can easily consult the bibliography to see if a reference has been used and entered. —07:30, 6 November 2023 (EST) | :{{Reply to|Debbiebwolfe}} I would put references at the bottom, in a bibliography section. Then you can use the shortened footnotes in the body. This is an easier approach for everyone editing, as they can easily consult the bibliography to see if a reference has been used and entered. —07:30, 6 November 2023 (EST) | ||
Do I need to have the citation section? I see that my shorten footnotes are displaying in the reference section.--[[User:Debbiebwolfe|Debbiebwolfe]] ([[User talk:Debbiebwolfe|talk]]) 15:48, 6 November 2023 (EST) | Do I need to have the citation section? I see that my shorten footnotes are displaying in the reference section.--[[User:Debbiebwolfe|Debbiebwolfe]] ([[User talk:Debbiebwolfe|talk]]) 15:48, 6 November 2023 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:44, 6 November 2023
Layout and Lead
Just to get this thing going, I have created the article, developed a rudimentary layout, and added a lead written by ChatGTP. All of this may be kept or changed. I would certainly revise or rewrite the lead. Questions, ideas, discussion, and comments about the project should be posted here. I'm looking forward to seeing what you all come up with this semester. —Admin (talk) 09:38, 3 October 2023 (EDT)
Citation question
I am citing a later edition of a source that is cited elsewhere on the page. (Markel, Mike, and Selber, Stuart. (2021). Technical Communication (13th ed). This version has a second author. Should these entries be combined somehow?
- @Beth Kennedy: Yes. If you’re using the updated version, update the earlier source. Great question, but don’t forget to sign your talk posts. —Admin (talk) 14:35, 2 November 2023 (EDT)
References question
Should References be the heading, followed by Bibliography as a subheading? Would this only apply if we are using Notes, Citations, and a Bibliography?--CEToledo (talk) 19:14, 4 November 2023 (EDT)
- @CEToledo: You can do whatever seems logical for this. Check out The Man Who Studied Yoga to see a way to approach a references section. —Admin (talk) 07:27, 6 November 2023 (EST)
--Debbiebwolfe (talk) 12:50, 6 November 2023 (EST)== Shortened footnote code == I am having trouble understanding where the placement of the works cited and the shortened footnote code should be. I sent an inquiry email to Dr. Lucas. Debbiebwolfe (talk) 14:41, 5 November 2023 (EST)
- @Debbiebwolfe: I would put references at the bottom, in a bibliography section. Then you can use the shortened footnotes in the body. This is an easier approach for everyone editing, as they can easily consult the bibliography to see if a reference has been used and entered. —07:30, 6 November 2023 (EST)
Do I need to have the citation section? I see that my shorten footnotes are displaying in the reference section.--Debbiebwolfe (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2023 (EST)