Talk:What is “wordiness”?: Difference between revisions

From LitWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 24: Line 24:


--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:32, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
--[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:32, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)
"That baby is gargantuan." This is not a wordy sentence, nor does it sound "ridiculous." You need to redefine "wordiness." Your list of works cited is also formatted oddly. --[[User:Glucas|Glucas]] 10:59, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 10:59, 25 April 2005

The word states (you spelled it "state's") is spelled incorrectly.Clarify, or try to simplify facts. -Amberly Keough

Define the first list for word choice and wordiness. The point was stated clearly through the paper. -Robert Bartosh

If you stated what wordiness and redundency are, the topic would be a lot easier to understand. Your examples were helpful. You may want to space some of the different subjects out so certain topics will stand out. -Whitney Behel

This entry is put together well. The grammer is good. The entry is staight to the point. D Davis

check wiki to revise page. ok daniel Epps

The entry could use a table of contents. You gave all the right info that you needed. If you use headings to break up your sections it will be more friendly to the scrolling eye.- Dave Burkert

Liked usage of lists in this one. There were a few errors to look over. Might go a little more in-depth. -Terence Heenan

Good entry. Great organization. Minor spelling errors. Anthony Jones


Paper was well written and it had good points. Topic chosen was illustrated in an effective way for the internet. It was easy to scan for important information, and good examples were being used. Over all paper was well written and no grammatical errors were noticed. Writer may have chosen to use bold print to illustrate things, but paper was good

--Apitt329 13:32, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)

"That baby is gargantuan." This is not a wordy sentence, nor does it sound "ridiculous." You need to redefine "wordiness." Your list of works cited is also formatted oddly. --Glucas 10:59, 25 Apr 2005 (EDT)