Talk:What is “tone”?: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Dave Burkert | Dave Burkert | ||
This entry is full understandable ways of using tone in writting. The entry is also put together clearly. D Davis | |||
Very good Lit wiki. You had a lot of information on what tone was. The examples were also very helpful. You may need to do a little revising. | |||
-Whitney Behel | |||
Very good article. Could not find any errors in it. Full of information and easy to understand. | |||
-Terence Heenan | |||
This is a good entry. It is clearly written. Anthony Jones | |||
The examples are helpful. need to revise. | |||
-daniel Epps | |||
Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief. | |||
-Robert Bartosh | |||
This was a good entry. I thought it was informative and not overly wordy. Try to be a little more clear about word choice's connection to tone.-Amberly Keough | |||
Papers was well written and easy to read. The bolded words catches the readers attention and it's easy to understand. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 20:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST) |
Latest revision as of 20:00, 24 March 2005
Try to make the sections a little more brief and to the point. Paragraphs of information do not catch the eye and make you want to read it, but try to bullet or bold information. These make the eye stop and read what is going on. You have great information within the wiki, but you just need to make it more appealing to eye. Think of it as you were scrolling the page quickly. What would catch your eye? Overall just need little revision.
Dave Burkert
This entry is full understandable ways of using tone in writting. The entry is also put together clearly. D Davis
Very good Lit wiki. You had a lot of information on what tone was. The examples were also very helpful. You may need to do a little revising. -Whitney Behel
Very good article. Could not find any errors in it. Full of information and easy to understand. -Terence Heenan
This is a good entry. It is clearly written. Anthony Jones
The examples are helpful. need to revise. -daniel Epps
Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief. -Robert Bartosh
This was a good entry. I thought it was informative and not overly wordy. Try to be a little more clear about word choice's connection to tone.-Amberly Keough
Papers was well written and easy to read. The bolded words catches the readers attention and it's easy to understand. --Dflowers 20:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)