Talk:What is the “passive voice”?: Difference between revisions

From LitWiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


This entry is very well organized. Add a table of contents. If you bold the word examples it will grab the eye. Could add outer links to the entry.-Dave Burkert
This entry is very well organized. Add a table of contents. If you bold the word examples it will grab the eye. Could add outer links to the entry.-Dave Burkert
This entry is very informative, but the word count needs to be cut in half to keep the readers attention. You had a few machanical errors also. --[[User:Dflowers|Dflowers]] 13:38, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)

Revision as of 14:38, 24 March 2005

You may want to explain what passive voice is a little clearer. I like how you stated when passive voice should be used. That topic was very helpful. You might want to open up the first paragraph in a way simialar to how you exlpained possessive tense. - Whitney Behel

Do something to grab the readers attention. Nothing on this paper grabed my attention while scrolling it. -Robert Bartosh

The entry is kind of wordy. It needs to get to the point quicker. But over all the rest of the entry is clear and easy to use. D Davis

This entry is full of information. However it does not keep my attention. Anthony Jones

This article needs a bit more structure to it. It just seemed too sparadic. Just bring it a bit more together. -Terence Heenan

+ This entry is full of information. However it does not keep my attention. Anthony Jones

This entry is very well organized. Add a table of contents. If you bold the word examples it will grab the eye. Could add outer links to the entry.-Dave Burkert

This entry is very informative, but the word count needs to be cut in half to keep the readers attention. You had a few machanical errors also. --Dflowers 13:38, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)