User:Camdino234/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From LitWiki
m (Corrections.)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
  | pages = 99-102
  | pages = 99-102
}}
}}
{{Cite book
| last = Klinkowitz
| first = Jerome
| year = 1973
| title = The Vonnegut Statement
| publisher = Library of Congress
| location = 
| pages = 147-148
}}
A major theme presented in the story is the pessimism of technology.
Science fiction.1973 p.147 p. 148 | Vonnegut's depiction of science fiction correlating to equality is the absurdity of humanity.[147] The fusion of technology and humanity in this world hinders the capabilities of human variance, causing the destruction of the universe.[148}
A theme presented in the story is the callousness of ventures. Montresor appraises his murder as a successful act of vengeance and punishment rather than a crime.[3] Montresor's motto " No one insults me with impunity", interprets that punishing his offender is a matter of fulfilling his duty of honor before his noble ancestry.[6]

Latest revision as of 09:47, 20 October 2021

Works Cited

  • Fitzgerald, F. Scott (2002). "Babylon Revisited". Reading And Writing About Literature. Upper Saddle Creek, NJ: Prentice hall. pp. 6–18.
  • McCracken, David (June 2017). "Restitution in F. Scott Fitzgerald's 'Babylon Revisited'". Language of Publication. 75 (2): 99–102.

Klinkowitz, Jerome (1973). The Vonnegut Statement. Library of Congress. pp. 147–148.


A major theme presented in the story is the pessimism of technology. Science fiction.1973 p.147 p. 148 | Vonnegut's depiction of science fiction correlating to equality is the absurdity of humanity.[147] The fusion of technology and humanity in this world hinders the capabilities of human variance, causing the destruction of the universe.[148}




A theme presented in the story is the callousness of ventures. Montresor appraises his murder as a successful act of vengeance and punishment rather than a crime.[3] Montresor's motto " No one insults me with impunity", interprets that punishing his offender is a matter of fulfilling his duty of honor before his noble ancestry.[6]