User:Camdino234/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Camdino234 (talk | contribs) Created page with "== Works Cited == {{Cite book | last = Sipiora | first = Phillip | author-link = | year = 2002 | chapter = Babylon Revisited |title = <!-- Reading And Writing About Li..." |
Camdino234 (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Works Cited == | == Works Cited == | ||
* {{Cite book | |||
{{Cite book | | last = Fitzgerald | ||
| last = | | first = F. Scott | ||
| first = | |||
| author-link = | | author-link = | ||
| year = 2002 | | year = 2002 | ||
| chapter = Babylon Revisited | | chapter = Babylon Revisited | ||
|title = | |title = Reading And Writing About Literature | ||
| publisher =Prentice hall | | publisher =Prentice hall | ||
| location = Upper Saddle Creek, NJ | | location = Upper Saddle Creek, NJ | ||
| pages =6-18 | | pages =6-18 | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{Cite journal | |||
| author = McCracken | |||
| first = David | |||
| date = June 2017 | |||
| title = Restitution in F. Scott Fitzgerald's 'Babylon Revisited' | |||
| journal = Language of Publication | |||
| volume = 75 | |||
| issue = 2 | |||
| pages = 99-102 | |||
}} | |||
{{Cite book | |||
| last = Klinkowitz | |||
| first = Jerome | |||
| year = 1973 | |||
| title = The Vonnegut Statement | |||
| publisher = Library of Congress | |||
| location = | |||
| pages = 147-148 | |||
}} | |||
A major theme presented in the story is the pessimism of technology. | |||
Science fiction.1973 p.147 p. 148 | Vonnegut's depiction of science fiction correlating to equality is the absurdity of humanity.[147] The fusion of technology and humanity in this world hinders the capabilities of human variance, causing the destruction of the universe.[148} | |||
| Line 19: | Line 41: | ||
A theme presented in the story is the callousness of ventures. Montresor appraises his murder as a successful act of vengeance and punishment rather than a crime.[3] Montresor's motto " No one insults me with impunity", interprets that punishing his offender is a matter of fulfilling his duty of honor before his noble ancestry.[6] | |||