Synecdoche: Difference between revisions

2,362 bytes removed ,  9 years ago
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Synecdoche''' (sə-nek-də-kē; from the Greek synekdoche which translates to "simultaneous understanding") is a literary device that utilizes a part of an object or the entire object is used to represent some part of the whole object. This trope can function in many ways as a literary device. It can allow larger groups to represent a smaller one or vice versa. It can also refer to a thing by the material it is made of or the packaging it is contained in.
'''Synecdoche''' (sə-nek-də-kē; from the Greek synekdoche which translates to "simultaneous understanding"<ref>http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/synecdoche</ref>) is a literary device that utilizes a part of an object or the entire object is used to represent some part of the whole object. This trope can function in many ways as a literary device. It can allow larger groups to represent a smaller one or vice versa. It can also refer to a thing by the material it is made of or the packaging it is contained in.




Line 15: Line 15:
==== William Shakespeare's ''The Tragedy of Julius Caesar'' ====
==== William Shakespeare's ''The Tragedy of Julius Caesar'' ====
"Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears..."<ref name=Ref2/> are the opening words of Mark Antony's famous speech during Act III, scene ii of the play. The "parts of a whole" connection comes from the ears that are part of the whole human body. Antony does not plea for his countrymen's physical ears; rather, he requires what they represent: their attention and their minds.
"Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears..."<ref name=Ref2/> are the opening words of Mark Antony's famous speech during Act III, scene ii of the play. The "parts of a whole" connection comes from the ears that are part of the whole human body. Antony does not plea for his countrymen's physical ears; rather, he requires what they represent: their attention and their minds.
If we need another literary example, we can use Charles Dickens's ''Little Dorrit.''


== Alongside Metonymy ==
== Alongside Metonymy ==
There is a great deal of uncertainty regarding defining metonymy and categorizing words as metonymical.  Most definitions are vague, thereby giving the confusing implication that any word can reflect metonymy if used in the right context.  In Hugh Bredin's article “Metonymy,” he supplies a general definition for metonymy which states that “metonymy is the transfer of the name of a thing to something else that is closely associated with it - such as cause and effect, container and contained, possessor and possessed, and so on; for example, "crown" or "throne" for monarchy” (45). <ref name=Ref4/> Bredin asserts that such a definition is an “enumeration of instances” that poorly explains the exact function of metonymical words.  The one aspect that all critics agree upon in regards to metonymy is that synecdoche is it's relative.  More specifically synecdoche is a subsection of metonymy.  In order to distinguish between metonymy and synecdoche, a person must examine the relationship of the words involved.  
Synecdoche and Metonymy are similar, but different. BUILD OFF OF THIS
=== Differences ===
=== Differences ===
According to Bredin, “synecdochic relations are structural, and metonymical relations are extrinsic – relations, in the one case, between particulars and their parts, and in the other case between particulars and other particulars” (54). <ref name=Ref4/> “Synecdoche deals with the intra-relativity: the relation of the whole and its parts. The individual is so far finished as to be characterized by a part of itself” (252). While synecdoche focuses on intra-relativity (the relation of the whole and its parts), metonymy focuses on extra-relativity (the “intuitions of necessary relation”).  In “A Grouping of Figures of Speech, Based upon the Principle of Their Effectiveness” by Herbert Eveleth Greene, “metonymy names things at a slight remove: instead of naming the thing itself, it names something associated with it, and trusts to the imagination to supply what is not stated, – both the thing unnamed and the relation which bridges the gulf between the two” (438). <ref name=Ref5/> For example, “War is sad.”  On the other hand, synecdoche deals with words or relations between words such as alternate names for the same thing. For example, nickel can be interchanged with five coin piece (Bredin 52). <ref name=Ref4/>
=== Similarities ===
=== Similarities ===


Line 35: Line 31:
==References==
==References==
<references>
<references>
<ref> [http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/synecdoche/''Merriam-Webster Definition of Synecdoche''</ref>
* <ref name=Ref1>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech/ ''Figure of Speech''] </ref>
* <ref name=Ref1>[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech/ ''Figure of Speech''] </ref>
* <ref name=Ref2>[http://www.shakespeare-navigators.com/JC_Navigator/JC_3_2.html#speech30/ ''Julius Caesar''] </ref>
* <ref name=Ref2>[http://www.shakespeare-navigators.com/JC_Navigator/JC_3_2.html#speech30/ ''Julius Caesar''] </ref>
* <ref name=Ref3>[http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-syn1.htm/ ''World Wide Words''] </ref>
* <ref name=Ref3>[http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-syn1.htm/ ''World Wide Words''] </ref>
* <ref name=Ref4>[http://www.jstor.org.ezproxy.mga.edu/stable/pdfplus/1772425.pdf?acceptTC=true/ "Metonymy"] </ref>
* <ref name=Ref5>[http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/10.2307/456138.pdf/ "A Grouping of Figures of Speech"] </ref>
twitter
22

edits