https://litwiki.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&feedformat=atom&user=Rob 2026-05-03T19:52:12Z User contributions MediaWiki 1.43.0 https://litwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:What_is_%E2%80%9Credundancy%E2%80%9D%3F&diff=3461 2005-03-24T18:26:06Z

<p>Rob: </p> <hr /> <div>I like the way yours was broken into certain sections. You were clear and it caught my attention. You could maybe do a few more examples.-Amberly Keough<br /> <br /> The entry was well cited and has a lot of great information. You could add links to other pages. Add a table of contents to the entry so that a person could go directly to a part about redundancy they want to read about. You have good examples and with some quick fixes it will be a good entry. - Dave Burkert<br /> <br /> THis entry is very to the point. It has alot of good imformation. D Davis<br /> <br /> This article had a lot of good information and examples. Didn't like how the page was seperated though.<br /> -Terence Heenan<br /> <br /> <br /> I like the format that the author used to illustrate their point. I like the way the examples were given . The paper seemed to have pretty good scanability and it was decently sufficient in the information it gave on the topic. Over all there were not any grammatical errors noticed, but more elaborative sentences could have been used.<br /> --[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:14, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)<br /> <br /> like the format. easy to read. good job.<br /> <br /> This entry was formatted very well. The examples were done very creativly.<br /> -Robert Bartosh</div>

Rob https://litwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:What_is_%E2%80%9Ctone%E2%80%9D%3F&diff=3433 2005-03-24T18:23:14Z

<p>Rob: </p> <hr /> <div>Try to make the sections a little more brief and to the point. Paragraphs of information do not catch the eye and make you want to read it, but try to bullet or bold information. These make the eye stop and read what is going on. You have great information within the wiki, but you just need to make it more appealing to eye. Think of it as you were scrolling the page quickly. What would catch your eye? Overall just need little revision. <br /> <br /> Dave Burkert<br /> <br /> <br /> This entry is full understandable ways of using tone in writting. The entry is also put together clearly. D Davis<br /> <br /> Very good Lit wiki. You had a lot of information on what tone was. The examples were also very helpful. You may need to do a little revising. <br /> -Whitney Behel<br /> <br /> Very good article. Could not find any errors in it. Full of information and easy to understand.<br /> -Terence Heenan<br /> <br /> This is a good entry. It is clearly written. Anthony Jones<br /> <br /> The examples are helpful. need to revise.<br /> -daniel Epps<br /> <br /> Good entry, lots of material.Could make it a little more brief.<br /> -Robert Bartosh</div>

Rob https://litwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:What_is_the_difference_between_possessives_and_plurals%3F&diff=3437 2005-03-24T18:20:04Z

<p>Rob: </p> <hr /> <div>This was a well written article. I feel that all of the headings and following material for each one was a great style for it. Good job on citing the works, too.<br /> -Terence Heenan<br /> <br /> Very well written. The wiki site flows logically and has information bulleted and bold so it grabs the attention of the reader. Has works cited at bottom and done correctly. You could add similar web sites as links at the bottom. - Dave Burkert<br /> <br /> This was a good entry. I think your first paragraph was a little wordy. Anthony Jones<br /> <br /> This paper had decent scanability. It was somewhat difficult to read due to the appearance of some run-on's. Some ideas should have been simplified in language to clearly illustrate authors point. Some more information should have been added to further the topic a bit more. There were not many outside links, but paper was overall O.K.<br /> --[[User:Apitt329|Apitt329]] 13:00, 24 Mar 2005 (EST)<br /> <br /> This enrty has some good examples. But it needs to be more to the point<br /> D Davis<br /> <br /> This was good, but could use a little more explanantion on plurals.<br /> -Amberly Keough<br /> <br /> The entry was very well written, but could improve on scanability.</div>

Rob https://litwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:How_do_I_know_when_I_need_to_use_a_comma%3F&diff=3422 2005-03-24T18:04:58Z

<p>Rob: </p> <hr /> <div>There were a few spelling errors,specifically hamster and together. Another thing is the paragraph before the eight rules could be narrowed slightly. I thought this was a good entry.<br /> -Amberly Keough<br /> <br /> <br /> I liked how you use the example to explain how to use the commas correctly. Check over your first paragraph you may want to re-word some of the sentences. Very helpful Lit wiki.<br /> -Whitney Behel<br /> <br /> This article was well written and informative. There seemed to be very few spelling and grammar errors. This entry could have used some more works to cite.<br /> -Terence Heenan<br /> <br /> This was a good entry. It was full of information. I think you could condense this entry to make it more scannable. Anthony Jones<br /> <br /> This paper was very well written. It was clearly understandable, yet it could have used maybe some bold print in some areas to draw the readers attention.<br /> -Robert Bartosh</div>

Rob https://litwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:What_is_the_%E2%80%9Cpassive_voice%E2%80%9D%3F&diff=3396 2005-03-24T18:00:26Z

<p>Rob: </p> <hr /> <div>You may want to explain what passive voice is a little clearer. I like how you stated when passive voice should be used. That topic was very helpful. You might want to open up the first paragraph in a way simialar to how you exlpained possessive tense. <br /> - Whitney Behel<br /> <br /> Do something to grab the readers attention. Nothing on this paper grabed my attention while scrolling it.<br /> -Robert Bartosh</div>

Rob https://litwiki.org/index.php?title=Talk:What_is_%E2%80%9Cwordiness%E2%80%9D%3F&diff=3397 2005-03-24T17:57:06Z

<p>Rob: </p> <hr /> <div>The word states (you spelled it &quot;state's&quot;) is spelled incorrectly.Clarify, or try to simplify facts.<br /> -Amberly Keough<br /> <br /> Define the first list for word choice and wordiness. The point was stated clearly through the paper.<br /> -Robert Bartosh</div>

Rob